DADA · WORK

La Sainte Vierge

Francis Picabia · 1920

The holiest figure in Catholic France, the Virgin Mary, rendered as a single splatter of black ink on a gray sheet, captioned in Picabia’s hand and signed. No skill, no subject, no labor: just a flick of ink and a sacred title colliding to insult Church and Art at once.

The canvas
Tap to zoom
Francis Picabia, La Sainte Vierge, 1920. India ink and graphite on paper. 1 ft 1 in × 9 1/2 in.
Centre Pompidou / Musée National d’Art Moderne, Paris. Acquired 2008 (with the participation of Frieder Burda), acc. AM 2008-91
Look closer
Find these on the canvas above
  1. The splatter itself
    The center of the sheet, the single dark mass that is the whole “image”
    One generous blot of black India ink, irregular and organic, with no contour and nothing you could read as a figure. There is no Madonna anywhere on the page except in the words above it. The literal fact is a stain; that the stain stands in for the Virgin is entirely the work of the title.
  2. The drips
    Trailing off the main mass, fine runs where the wet ink ran before it dried
    Thin runs of ink trail away from the blot, the plain record of gravity and chance: ink let fall and allowed to move on its own. In the original drawing they run one way; the 391 plate is mirror-flipped, so there they run the other way.
  3. The caption, “LA SAINTE VIERGE”
    Hand-lettered across the top of the sheet, above the blot
    The title is written out plainly in blue-violet ink, unceremonious, in Picabia’s own hand. It is the caption, not the mark, that performs the whole provocation: these three words are what turn a stain into “the Blessed Virgin.” Without them there is no work, only a blot.
  4. The signature
    Below the blot, in the same blue-violet ink
    “Francis Picabia,” inscribed underneath. It is the only conventional gesture of authorship on the page, a painter signing his picture, except that the picture is an accident. The signature claims an act of chance as a deliberate work of art, which is exactly the readymade move: the naming, not the making, is what is being signed.
  5. The bare ground
    The empty gray paper surrounding the blot
    A near-empty sheet around the mark: no halo, no setting, no composition, none of the gold and drapery a Madonna is owed. The emptiness is doing work, not failing to. Maximum sacred subject, minimum means; the void around the stain is part of the insult.
  6. The deliberate crudeness
    The whole sheet, the rough unfinished handling of every part of it
    Nothing here is refined, corrected, or finished. The lettering is plain, the blot is raw, the drips are left where they fell. For centuries a Holy Virgin was the supreme test of a painter’s polish; the roughness is the message, because skill and finish are precisely what Dada is refusing.
The story · 5 chapters
~18 min total
1
Paris · 1920
A wealthy provocateur and his anarchic little magazine
Picabia, an ex-Cubist millionaire turned Dada’s chief publisher, ran an irregular review called 391, full of lewd drawings, scrambled type, and attacks on good taste. Into issue 12 he dropped a blot titled for the Virgin.
2
The making
A drop of ink, a caption, a signature
The whole work is a single black ink blot let fall on a gray sheet, with the title lettered above and his name below in blue-violet ink. The drawing now in Paris and the magazine plate are mirror images, because 391 printed it cropped and reversed.
3
The sheet
A stain offered as the Madonna
The blot, the drips that record gravity and chance, the hand-lettered “LA SAINTE VIERGE,” the signature claiming authorship over an accident, the bare ground around it, and the deliberate crudeness of all of it.
4
The break
Both skill and subject, dethroned in one gesture
A flick of the wrist titled as a sacred image, where the content is the chance of the ink and the provocation of the name. The line runs forward to Surrealist automatism, art informel, and the poured paint of Action Painting.
5
After
One image, several objects
There is no single Sainte Vierge: a drawing now at the Pompidou, a cropped and reversed magazine plate, a separate lithograph at Yale. The drawing was bought by the Musée National d’Art Moderne in 2008.
1920
Made
1′1″ × 9½″
Dimensions
Centre Pompidou
Now at
Provenance
Every hand it passed through
1920
Francis Picabia (the artist)
Paris
Made in 1920 and reproduced, cropped and mirror-reversed, in Picabia’s own review 391, no. 12 (Paris, March 1920). Earlier ownership of the drawing before the 2008 purchase is not stated on the museum record.
2008–today
Museum purchase, 2008 (with Frieder Burda)
Musée National d’Art Moderne, Centre PompidouMuseum
Paris
Bought by the museum in 2008, with the participation of the collector Frieder Burda, for its Cabinet d’art graphique (Graphic Arts Cabinet). Accession AM 2008-91. No purchase figure is published in the sources.