FAUVISM · WORK

Blue Nude (Souvenir de Biskra)

Henri Matisse · 1907

A reclining nude Matisse painted only because the clay sculpture of her broke in his studio, sent to the 1907 Salon so ugly on purpose that six years later a Chicago crowd burned copies of it and put the painter on mock trial.

The canvas
Tap to zoom
Henri Matisse, Blue Nude (Souvenir de Biskra), 1907. Oil on canvas. 3 ft 1/4 in × 4 ft 7 1/4 in.
The Baltimore Museum of Art. The Cone Collection, Baltimore Museum of Art (bequest of Etta Cone, 1950; acc. 1950.228)
Look closer
Find these on the canvas above
  1. The twisted, impossible pose
    The whole reclining figure, head at upper left, legs at right
    She lies on her side, but her torso wrenches up and around toward us while her hips stay turned away, so you read the front and the back of one body at the same time. One arm bends up behind the head; the spine makes a long S-curve. This is a sculptor’s pose, not a life-class one, the same twist Matisse was modeling in clay, which is why it feels carved into the canvas rather than observed across a studio.
  2. Blue shadow doing the modeling
    Along the underside of the torso, the far breast, the crook of the bent arm, the hollows of the body
    The “blue” of the title is not her skin; it is the shadow. Matisse pushes passages of blue into the hollows and undersides of the body the way a sculptor pushes shadow into clay with a thumb, so a flat painting reads as something with weight and volume. The same blue bleeds out of the body and into the grass, which ties the figure and the ground into one surface instead of a figure set in front of a background.
  3. The remembered palm and the oasis
    Upper right and behind the figure, the fronded plant and the band of “grass”
    A stylized palm and a strip of vegetation set her in an oasis, the Biskra of the title, remembered rather than observed. The ground she lies on is the “opaque blue grass” the hostile critics fixed on. It is not a window onto a real desert; it is a flat band of color, a memory of a place stitched in behind a studio nude.
  4. The swelling hip and the heavy contour
    Center of the canvas, the great upward curve of the hip and buttock, and the dark line around the whole body
    The hip swells up to the highest point of the whole composition, and a thick, deliberate dark contour rings the figure like a drawn outline. Academic “finish,” the smooth invisible blending of a Salon nude, is simply gone. Look how the curve of the buttock is echoed by the hollow under the palm fronds: body and plant rhyme with each other, the picture built on repeated shapes.
  5. The bulked, simplified body and its sources
    The whole mass of the figure, the broad shoulders, the blunt simplified features, the weightiness
    The body is broadened and simplified into mass over grace, closer to a carved idol than to a graceful Salon nude. This is the moment Matisse and his circle (Picasso, Derain, Vlaminck) were looking hard at African and other non-European sculpture arriving in Paris through colonial channels, their makers unnamed, a turn art historians call primitivism. Scholars split on what Matisse meant by it, whether he is critiquing or reinforcing Western ideals of the nude in the colony, and that reading is a live argument, not a settled fact.
  6. Color that recurs across body and plant
    Everywhere, the skin, the plants, the lips and nipples
    The paint is laid on visibly and roughly, and the colors repeat across the whole surface: red turns up in the palm stem and again in the lips and nipples, pink in both the figure and the base of the palm, blue in both the body’s shadows and the grass. Nothing pretends to be a faithful copy of nature. It is a built surface of a few colors thrown back and forth between the woman and the oasis until the two are made of the same paint.
The story · 5 chapters
~18 min total
1
Algeria · 1906
The two weeks in the oasis
Matisse spends about two weeks in French Algeria, including the desert oasis town of Biskra. He paints nothing major there. A year later, back in France, he makes a picture out of the memory and calls it a souvenir.
2
The studio · 1906–07
The sculpture that broke into a painting
He was modeling a small reclining figure in clay when the fragile thing broke. Rather than repair it at once, he worked the same twisted pose out in oil. Blue Nude is that painting, a sculptor’s problem solved in paint.
3
The canvas
A body modeled in blue
Read the painting itself: the wrenched reclining pose that shows front and back at once, the blue that is shadow and not skin, the heavy dark contour, the swelling hip, the remembered palm and the band of blue grass.
4
Paris · spring 1907
The ugliest thing at the Indépendants
Shown at the Salon des Indépendants, the picture is read as gratuitously ugly, savage, unfinished. The critic who had coined “Fauves” sneers at the nude on its blue grass under palm trees. The scandal is the point.
5
After
Burned in copy, bought by a sister
The Steins buy it and lend it to the 1913 Armory Show, where Chicago students burn copies and try the painter in absentia. It passes to Quinn, then to the Baltimore sisters Claribel and Etta Cone, and the original survives, unharmed, at the BMA.
1907
Painted
3′¼″ × 4′7¼″
Dimensions
Baltimore (BMA)
Now at
Provenance
Every hand it passed through
1907
Henri Matisse (the artist)
Paris
Painted in early 1907 and shown that spring at the Salon des Indépendants, where the public read it as gratuitously ugly. Sold soon after to the Steins.
1907–1920
acquired early, direct
Leo & Gertrude Stein
Paris (27 rue de Fleurus)
The American expatriate siblings, Matisse’s earliest serious patrons, bought it not long after the Salon. They still owned it in 1913 and lent it to the Armory Show, which is why older accounts correctly call it “on loan from Leo and Gertrude Stein.”
1920–1924
John Quinn
New York
Leo Stein sold it to the New York lawyer John Quinn in 1920. Quinn had been the single most important American backer of the 1913 Armory Show.
1924–1926
Estate of John Quinn
New York / Paris
Quinn died in 1924 and his vast modern collection was dispersed.
1926
~120,760 francs (≈ $4,830, reported)
Quinn estate sale (Hôtel Drouot, Paris) → Dr. Claribel Cone
Paris → Baltimore
At the Quinn sale in Paris on 28 October 1926, the Baltimore collector Dr. Claribel Cone bought it for a reported 120,760 francs (about $4,830). (Price reported via secondary sources; kept attributed.)
1929–1949
inherited
Etta Cone
Baltimore
Claribel died in 1929; her holdings passed to her sister Etta, who consolidated the Cone Collection of Baltimore.
1950–today
bequest
The Baltimore Museum of ArtMuseum
Baltimore
Bequeathed by Etta Cone (d. 1949) and accessioned in 1950 as part of The Cone Collection. Acc. 1950.228. On view, in one of the world’s largest Matisse holdings.