POST-IMPRESSIONISM · WORK

The Starry Night

Vincent van Gogh · 1889

A swirling night sky over a sleeping village, painted by daylight in an asylum studio, that its own maker called a failure.

The canvas
Tap to zoom
Vincent van Gogh, The Starry Night, 1889. Oil on canvas. 2 ft 5 in × 3 ft 1/4 in.
Museum of Modern Art, New York. Acquired through the Lillie P. Bliss Bequest (by exchange), 1941
Look closer
Find these on the canvas above
  1. The one star he actually named
    The single largest, brightest “star,” out toward the center of the sky, just to the right of the central cypress
    This is not a star at all but the planet Venus, the morning star, the one celestial body Van Gogh names in his letter to Theo, where he wrote that he had seen the countryside before sunrise with nothing but the morning star, which looked very big. It is the single element on the canvas you can tie to a documented observation, and astronomical records confirm Venus was prominent at dawn in Provence that spring.
  2. The moon that is astronomically wrong
    Upper right, the glowing yellow-orange crescent
    The moon glows as a thin crescent, but on the real date the moon over Saint-Rémy was a waning gibbous, nearly full. So the crescent is an invention, not a record. It is the cleanest proof on the canvas that this is a composed picture, not a transcription of one night’s sky.
  3. The flame that is a tree
    Foreground left, the dark spire that climbs the whole left edge
    A cypress, pushed far larger and closer than life until it reads like a dark green flame licking up into the stars. Cypresses were a Saint-Rémy obsession Van Gogh painted again and again that year. Nothing forces it to that size; he chose to exaggerate it, and the deliberate distortion is the heart of why the picture feels modern rather than observed.
  4. The village that was never there
    Lower center, the cluster of houses around a tall, thin church steeple
    The sleeping town sits under the sky with a tall narrow steeple rising from it, and that steeple is more Dutch and northern than anything in Provence. The village is largely invented, not the actual view from his barred window. It is the tell that the whole picture is synthesized in the studio, the real and the imagined stitched together.
  5. The sky that no sky has ever done
    Across the whole upper half, the great curling eddies and the scattered stars
    The stars (roughly a dozen, by the usual count) sit inside enormous rolling spirals of paint that no real night sky has ever produced. This is pure expressive invention, laid on in thick ridges of pigment (impasto, paint heaped so high the brush leaves standing furrows you can read as texture). The swirls are often read as a vision of his illness, but that is interpretation, not fact; Van Gogh himself denied a romantic or religious program for the picture.
  6. The one real thing along the bottom of the sky
    The low band of rolling blue hills along the horizon, behind the village
    These are the Alpilles, the low mountain range just south of Saint-Rémy, and they are the one topographically real backdrop element in the painting. Everything above them swirls into invention; the hills are the thin thread of the actual valley he could see.
The story · 5 chapters
~18 min total
1
Saint-Rémy · 1889
The man at the barred window
After the breakdown in Arles, Van Gogh checks himself into the Saint-Paul asylum and is given a ground-floor room as a studio and an east-facing bedroom that looks out over the valley.
2
The making
Painted by day, from a dawn he remembered
Not painted at the window at night. Made in the studio in daylight, working up the pre-dawn view he had watched with the morning star big over the hills, the village largely invented.
3
The canvas
The stars and a rolling sky
The cypress, the crescent moon, the one star he named, the invented steeple, the real Alpilles, and the great curling eddies that have no model in any real sky.
4
His own verdict
The picture he called a failure
Van Gogh thought it a near-miss, told Bernard he had reached for stars too big, and it sold no better than the rest. He did not sell only one painting in his life, but he never sold this one.
5
After
How a failure became a touchstone
His brother dead within months, the estate carried by Theo’s widow Jo, the canvas passing through dealers to MoMA in 1941, where the 20th century made it one of the most recognizable paintings on Earth.
June 1889
Painted
2′5″ × 3′¼″
Dimensions
MoMA
Now at
Provenance
Every hand it passed through
1889–1890
Vincent van Gogh (the artist)
Saint-Rémy / Auvers
Painted in June 1889 at the Saint-Paul-de-Mausole asylum. Never sold in his lifetime; passed to his brother Theo on Vincent’s death in July 1890.
1890–1900
Theo van Gogh, then Johanna (Jo) van Gogh-Bonger
Paris / Netherlands
Theo died in January 1891; his widow Jo inherited the estate and spent her life building Van Gogh’s posthumous reputation.
1900–1906
Julien Leclercq · Émile Schuffenecker · (repurchased by Jo van Gogh-Bonger)
Paris
Sold to the poet Leclercq in 1900, to the painter-collector Schuffenecker in 1901, then bought back by Jo in 1905 before passing to the Oldenzeel Gallery, Rotterdam, in 1906.
1906–1938
Georgette P. van Stolk
Rotterdam
Held in a Rotterdam collection for some three decades.
1938–1941
Paul Rosenberg (dealer)
Paris / New York
Acquired by the dealer Rosenberg, who fled France for the United States in 1940.
1941–today
by exchange
Museum of Modern ArtMuseum
New York
Acquired through the Lillie P. Bliss Bequest, by exchange (traded for rather than bought with cash). Accession 472.1941. There the 20th century made it canonical. On permanent view.