Western PhilosophyStuff Happened · Philosophy
Black-and-white photograph of a balding, clean-shaven man in a dark Victorian coat and high collar, seated and looking slightly away from the camera with a grave, tired expression
Thinker · Utilitarians

Mill

1806 – 1873 · Utilitarians · The nineteenth century · 2 works

He was the most thoroughly engineered mind of the nineteenth century. His father started him on Greek at three, Latin at eight, the whole apparatus of logic and economics before most children finish primary school, all of it built to produce a perfect instrument of Jeremy Bentham's utilitarianism, the doctrine that the right act is the one that produces the most happiness. The instrument worked, and then at twenty it broke down: Mill asked himself whether getting everything he had been trained to want would make him happy, and something in him answered no. He climbed out of that depression through poetry, and he came out the other side with a utilitarianism his teachers would not have recognized. Bentham had said all pleasures are equal, that the game of push-pin is as good as poetry if it gives as much pleasure. Mill said no: some pleasures are higher than others, better to be Socrates dissatisfied than a fool satisfied. From that one repair the rest of his life unfolds: *On Liberty*, with its harm principle drawing a hard line around the individual against the crowd, written hand in hand with [Harriet Taylor](/philosophy/thinker/taylor), the woman he called its true co-author; *The Subjection of Women*, the most radical argument for sexual equality the century produced; and three years in Parliament where he rose and asked the House of Commons to give women the vote. He took the cold arithmetic of pleasure he was raised on and gave it a conscience.

What changed
Before
Bentham: pleasures differ only in quantity, so any pleasure counts the same as any other of equal intensity and duration, and the game of push-pin is as good as poetry
After
Mill: pleasures differ in quality as well as quantity, some are intrinsically higher, and a utilitarianism worth defending protects the individual's liberty and dignity, not just the sum
Walk Mill’s whole systemThe ideas in order, start to finish, as one long read
Inside the walk-through
The manufactured mind
Better to be Socrates dissatisfied
The harm principle
Harriet Taylor
The subjection of women, and the seat in Parliament
The conscience he gave the calculus
The works
On Liberty
1859 · Five chapters
The one principle: power may be used over a person against their will only to prevent harm to others.
Read
Utilitarianism
1863 · Five chapters
The greatest-happiness principle defended, with higher and lower pleasures, against its critics.
Read
Read Mill in context: The nineteenth century