POST-IMPRESSIONISM · WORK

A Sunday on La Grande Jatte — 1884

Georges Seurat · 1886

Two years of work and countless tiny separate dots of pure color, building a frozen Sunday crowd, the founding monument of a whole new science of painting.

The canvas
Tap to zoom
Georges Seurat, A Sunday on La Grande Jatte — 1884, 1886. Oil on canvas. 6 ft 9 3/4 in × 10 ft 1 1/4 in.
Art Institute of Chicago. Helen Birch Bartlett Memorial Collection, 1926
Look closer
Find these on the canvas above
  1. The border that is painted, not framed
    The band of dots running all the way around the edge of the image, just inside the white wooden frame
    Around the whole picture runs a border made of painted dots, which Seurat added around 1888–89, a few years after the main canvas. It is not the frame; the plain white wooden frame sits outside it. The dotted border is part of the artwork itself, painted to control the transition from the image to the wall, and the Art Institute still shows it that way.
  2. The woman with a monkey
    Foreground right, the elegant couple, at the woman’s feet on a leash
    A fashionably dressed woman stands at the right holding a leash, and at the end of it is a small pet monkey, the detail most viewers miss entirely. In French a monkey is a singe, and in this era the animal carried a sly pun on female impropriety, so some read the monkey as the picture’s quiet social joke. Treat that reading as interpretation, not fact; the monkey on the leash is simply, verifiably there.
  3. The girl in white at the center
    Near the middle of the canvas, a small brightly lit child in a white dress
    Near the center stands a little girl in white, and she is rendered almost without dots, brightly and smoothly lit, so she becomes the one still, clear point in a canvas built entirely from broken color. She is the optical and compositional focus, the eye’s resting place in the dazzle.
  4. The dots, up close and far back
    Anywhere across the surface, but easiest to test in the broad sunlit lawn
    Stand close and the whole picture dissolves into countless separate dots and short strokes of pure, unmixed color. Step back and they fuse: the grass that looked like a confetti of green, yellow, orange, and blue up close reads as one luminous sunlit lawn from across the room. That fusing-in-the-eye is the entire method and the single best demonstration of why the painting was a break.
  5. A woman seeming to fish
    Left edge, at the waterline, a standing woman holding a rod
    At the left, by the water, a standing woman holds a fishing rod. Some scholars make a pun of it, since the French for “to fish” sounds close to the word for “to sin,” and read her as a hint at the area’s reputation. That is a reading, not a fact; at minimum she anchors the left edge of the composition.
  6. The grass you see is partly faded
    The broad areas of sunlit lawn, where the green is patched with dull brown
    Look for dull brownish patches in what should be brilliant sunlit grass. Those are not Seurat’s intention; he used a zinc yellow pigment that has chemically darkened to brown over the decades, so the lawn was meant to be far brighter and more golden than it now appears. What you are seeing is partly faded, a real conservation fact, not the original effect.
The story · 5 chapters
~18 min total
1
Paris · 1884
A science to replace Impressionism
Seurat, in his mid-20s, is building a rigorous, systematic alternative to Impressionism out of contemporary color theory. His subject: a real leisure island in the Seine where Parisians of every class stroll on Sundays.
2
The making
Two years, and the dots
Dozens of preparatory studies, then two years building the surface out of countless small dots meant to mix in the eye, not on the palette. Two names get used for the method, Divisionism and Pointillism, and they do not mean the same thing.
3
The canvas
A frozen Sunday, seven by ten feet
About forty-eight stiff figures, a woman with a pet monkey, a girl in white at the optical center, the painted dotted border, and grass that has darkened with age from a failing pigment.
4
May 1886
The eighth and last Impressionist show
It debuts at the final Impressionist exhibition to a divided room, some seeing the future, some put off by its airless, frozen calm. The critic Félix Fénéon champions it and coins the word “Neo-Impressionism.”
5
After
The icon, and the fade
Seurat dies suddenly at 31; the canvas passes through his brother to French collectors and reaches the Art Institute of Chicago in 1926, where it becomes a signature work, even as the sunlit lawn quietly browns.
1884–86
Painted
6′9¾″ × 10′1¼″
Dimensions
Art Institute
Now at
Provenance
Every hand it passed through
1886–1891
Georges Seurat (the artist)
Paris
Worked 1884–86, with the painted dotted border reworked around 1888–89. Held by Seurat until his sudden death in 1891, then passed to his family.
1891–1900
~800 francs
Émile Seurat (the artist’s brother)
Paris
The artist’s brother held it, then in 1900 sold it for about 800 francs to Léon-Casimir Bru, who bought on the advice of his daughter, the painter Lucie Cousturier.
1900–1924
Léon-Casimir Bru, then Lucie Cousturier
Paris
Cousturier inherited it from her father, then sold it in 1924 to the Paris gallery of Charles Vildrac.
1924
Charles Vildrac (gallery) → Frederic Clay & Helen Birch Bartlett
Paris / Chicago
Vildrac resold it the same year to the Chicago collectors Frederic Clay Bartlett and his wife Helen Birch Bartlett.
1926–today
gift in memoriam
Art Institute of ChicagoMuseum
Chicago
Given to the Art Institute in 1926 as the Helen Birch Bartlett Memorial Collection (acc. 1926.224). A condition reportedly restricts external loans. On permanent view.